Desk with a computer and flasks in chemical laboratory

EUROPEAN & UK PATENT ATTORNEY

Chemistry and pharma specialist. Cost-effective, bespoke services for global clients.

FLEXIBLE Patent Services,
BUILT for You

Drafting and filing

Icon of a document showing a flowchart diagram next to a pencil.

Drafting patent applications in the chemical field, with a focus on technical accuracy, coherent claim structure, and alignment with the relevant jurisdictional requirements.

Post-grant

Icon of a shield overlaid by a crossed sword.

Representation in EPO oppositions and appeals in the chemical sector - combining strong technical reasoning with persuasive advocacy to defend or challenge granted rights.

Prosecution

Icon of a document with two hands shaking in front of it.

Managing prosecution of chemical patent applications, including office action responses, third-party observations, and coordination of multi-jurisdictional cases.

Consultancy

Icon of two people seated at a table with a lightbulb above them.

Strategic advice on chemical patent matters, including patentability, freedom to operate, portfolio development and IP strategy - grounded in commercial awareness and technical expertise.

Who I work with

Icon showing a stylized globe topped with two flags, above four people silhouettes.

Overseas patent firms
looking for reliable EPO or
UK IPO representation

Icon of a tall office building behind a group of people silhouettes.

Corporates
seeking dependable patent counsel services

Icon of a hand holding a gear above its palm.

Busy patent firms
in need of experienced
overflow support

About me

Michal Dabrowka

Experienced UK and European Patent Attorney specialising in Chemistry and Pharma

Previously with: J A Kemp LLP, Potter Clarkson LLP

Before founding MD IP in Poland, I spent 12 years in the UK, including nearly 7 years at two of Europe’s top-tier patent firms.

My practice spans the full spectrum of chemistry, with particular expertise in agrochemicals, animal feed enzymes, fluorocarbons, foodstuffs, fat compositions, fuel additives and pharmaceuticals. I have also handled cases in more specialised fields, such as computational biochemistry, nanomedicine and mass spectrometry.

In addition to a proven track record in securing grants of chemical cases before the EPO, UK IPO, and globally, I have substantial experience in contentious EPO proceedings, including conducting oral hearings before both the Opposition Divisions and the Boards of Appeal.

Icon of a circular rosette badge with a check mark in the center.

Specialisms

  • Agrochemicals

  • Fluorocarbons

  • Foodstuffs

  • Fat compositions

  • Fuel additives

  • Refrigeration technology

  • Process chemistry

  • Pharmaceuticals

Icon of a circular award badge (rosette) with a star in the center.

Qualifications

  • UK & European
    Patent Attorney

  • IP Litigation Certificate

Icon of a diploma-style certificate with a ribbon seal at the bottom corner.

Education

  • MChem, University of Oxford

Testimonials

  • We sincerely appreciate all the wonderful work you've done for us.  Your contributions have been vital to our IP portfolio, and your deep understanding of our technology and keen eye for detail have been invaluable to our team.

    Senior patent counsel, leading global agrochemical company

  • It has been a pleasure to work with Michal, who is a highly intelligent, incisive and hard-working patent attorney.  Michal is very tenacious and always strives to secure the best possible outcomes for his clients, often against the odds.  He has a particular talent for identifying imaginative solutions to challenging patent office objections.  I also hope that Michal will not mind me noting that he is a bit of a perfectionist, but his pursuit of excellence is very much to the advantage of his clients and colleagues!

    Partner, leading European patent practice

  • Michal drafted our patent application.  He took the time to thoroughly understand our operation, ensuring that the patent application fully captured the unique nature of our processes. The patent was granted and now provides valuable protection for our investment.

    Director, leading UK recycling solutions company

  • I worked with Michal for several years and was always impressed by how quickly he grasped complex technical issues. He is sharp, responsive, and has a great eye for detail. His advice was always practical, easy to act on, and clearly communicated. Michal played a key role in shaping and strengthening our IP strategy during our time working together.

    Patent counsel, global foodstuffs company

  • I had the "pleasure" to have Michal as my adversary in EPO opposition proceedings. I was impressed by his skilful way of argumentation, and by his ability to quickly adapt to changing situations - which I believe is a key qualification in oral proceedings. If you want to have a representative who is 100% committed to your case, then Michal is an excellent choice.

    Partner, leading German patent practice

  • Michal is one of the most talented and thorough patent attorneys I know, and he’s easy to work with. Highly recommended!

    Partner, leading European patent practice

  • Having had the pleasure of working with Michal, I have found him to be a thorough, diligent and very responsive colleague and patent attorney. I would have no hesitation in recommending him.

    Partner, leading European patent practice

Blog

Recently Published
There’s an alternative, and then there’s an ‘alternative’ - T 1468/23
There’s an alternative, and then there’s an ‘alternative’ - T 1468/23

In T 1468/23, the EPO’s Board of Appeal overturned the reasoning of the Opposition Division on inventive step after reassessing the comparison between the claimed invention and the closest prior art.  Read more in the latest blog post.

Read More →
Added subject matter, unclear parameters - T 1184/23 and T 1440/23
Added subject matter, unclear parameters - T 1184/23 and T 1440/23

Two recent decisions from the EPO’s Technical Board of Appeal (T 1184/23 and T 1440/23) highlight the complexities of drafting, prosecuting and defending chemical patent applications with parametric definitions in the claims. Our latest article explains the key takeaways from both cases, offering practical guidance for applicants navigating clarity and added subject matter requirements before the EPO.

Read More →
Divisional applications at the European Patent Office
Divisional applications at the European Patent Office

There are several formal and practical aspects to keep in mind when filing divisional applications at the European Patent Office. Learn more in this article.

Read More →
A guide to ‘further processing’ at the European Patent Office
A guide to ‘further processing’ at the European Patent Office

Beyond remedying missed deadlines, further processing can offer valuable flexibility during European patent prosecution. Learn how to leverage it effectively as part of a coordinated global filing strategy.

Read More →
Parameters and (in)sufficiency of disclosure – T 2009/23
Parameters and (in)sufficiency of disclosure – T 2009/23

In T 2009/23, the Board of Appeal of the European Patent Office found that a key parameter in the main independent claim could not be reliably determined, leading to fatal insufficiency of disclosure.  Learn more in our latest article.

Read More →
T 1065/23 – on novelty and inventive step of pea protein extracts
T 1065/23 – on novelty and inventive step of pea protein extracts

T 1065/23 from the EPO’s Technical Board of Appeal illustrates how targeted experimental evidence can make or break product-by-process claims in the chemical field. Learn more in our latest article.

Read More →

Get in touch

Whether you're looking for support with a specific matter or simply want to explore how I might assist, I’d be glad to hear from you.

Get in touch to arrange a call, and we’ll take it from there.